ARP4754 Services

What is ARP4754?

ARP4754, or Aerospace Recommended Practice 4754A, is a globally recognized guideline developed by the Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE). Notably, it was officially adopted by the FAA in 2011. By providing a structured framework for the development of civil aircraft and systems, ARP4754 ensures a rigorous approach to aerospace engineering.

Moreover, its comprehensive lifecycle approach extends beyond design and testing to also include ongoing verification, maintenance, and eventual decommissioning of aerospace systems.

Why is ARP4754 Compliance Critical for Aerospace Systems?

ARP4754 ensures that complex aerospace systems are designed, verified, and certified with full traceability and risk management. It provides a structured approach to meeting regulatory standards and ensuring safety.

By adhering to ARP4754, you can:

Define and trace requirements with full visibility
Integrate multidisciplinary expertise for robust designs
Manage risks proactively to prevent costly setbacks
Streamline certification for faster approvals

At Aversan, we help you navigate complexity and stay compliant, so you can focus on building safer, more reliable aerospace systems.

White commercial airplane standing on the airport runway at sunset. Front view of passenger airplane is taking off. Airplane concept 3D illustration.

ARP4754 Development Process

1. Define System & Safety Requirements

Compliance starts with setting clear, measurable, and verifiable system-level requirements. More importantly, these requirements must align with FAA, EASA, and industry airworthiness regulations.

To strengthen safety, a Functional Hazard Assessment (FHA) helps identify risks and determine Development Assurance Levels (DALs) to ensure safety integrity.

2. Establish Requirement Traceability

Bi-directional traceability ensures that every system requirement connects directly to design architecture, verification activities, and compliance evidence. To make this process more efficient, a Requirements Traceability Matrix (RTM) helps track compliance. Additionally, leading tools like IBM DOORS, Jama Connect, and Polarion improve traceability and simplify change management.

3. Develop a Structured System Architecture

A clear and well-structured system architecture ensures consistency and accountability. It includes functional decomposition, system interfaces, and the relationships between hardware and software. To improve development, Model-Based Systems Engineering (MBSE) speeds up the process with simulation, early validation, and digital twin modeling.

4. Conduct Validation & Verification (V&V) Activities

Validation ensures that the system meets operational and regulatory requirements, while verification confirms adherence to design specifications. As part of this process, the ARP4754A V&V framework includes:

• Comprehensive test planning and execution at multiple levels, from subsystem to full system verification.

• Thorough peer reviews, inspections, and milestone assessments such as System Requirements Review (SRR), Preliminary Design Review (PDR), and Critical Design Review (CDR).

• Rigorous software and hardware verification in line with DO-178C (software) and DO-254 (hardware) standards.

5. Generate Compliance Evidence & Supporting Documentation

Regulatory agencies require detailed documentation as part of the certification process. To demonstrate compliance, evidence includes:

• Comprehensive test reports, verification matrices, and validation results.

• Thorough safety analyses such as Fault Tree Analysis (FTA), Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA), and Common Cause Analysis (CCA).

• Detailed configuration management records, ensuring full lifecycle traceability for audits and certification.

6. Achieve Regulatory Compliance & Certification

Working with FAA, EASA, and Transport Canada requires structured compliance planning. To facilitate this process, engaging with Designated Engineering Representatives (DERs) and independent assessors ensures smoother approval. Additionally, proactive certification planning helps minimize costly delays.

The Advantages of ARP4754 Compliance

Aerospace Compliance

ARP4754 not only ensures regulatory compliance but also provides clear, verifiable certification evidence. As a result, it builds stakeholder confidence in both safety and performance.

System Reliability
and Safety

This structured framework reduces errors while also ensuring consistent performance for critical aerospace systems. In turn, it supports mission success and enhances passenger safety.

Streamlined Certification

ARP4754 simplifies regulatory compliance by reducing non-conformances and ensuring audit-ready documentation. Because of this, certification becomes faster, helping you get to market sooner.

Optimized Costs and
Project Predictability

With a clear and traceable process, ARP4754 minimizes rework and improves efficiency. As a result, aerospace projects stay on schedule, within budget, and meet compliance requirements.

How Aversan Helps You Overcome ARP4754 Challenges

At Aversan, we specialize in ARP4754 services, systems engineering, and certification support. We make requirement management, integration, testing, and documentation seamless—helping you achieve regulatory compliance efficiently and cost-effectively.

Explore Our Solutions

Looking for ARP4754 compliance services? Get a free consultation today!

Get Started

You’re Building the Future.
We’ll Help You Get It Certified.

Bringing aerospace technology to life is no small feat. You’re solving complex challenges, pushing boundaries, and designing the future. At the same time, compliance shouldn’t slow you down.

At Aversan, we make it seamless, so you can focus on what you do best.

You lead the innovation,
we ensure compliance.

From concept to certification, we make sure every requirement is met with full traceability at every stage.

You need efficiency,
we simplify the process

We streamline documentation, testing, and verification so you can get regulatory approval faster and with less friction.

You prioritize safety,
we strengthen your approach.

With FHA, FMEA, and DALs, we integrate safety-driven compliance into your workflow—without the added complexity

You push boundaries,
we bring the experience.

Top aerospace teams trust us to certify their most advanced systems for FAA, EASA, and Transport Canada approval.

DHC waterbomber - DO 254 Compliant, ARP4754

We’re proud partners of:

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

1. Is ARP4754 compliance mandatory for certification?

While not legally mandatory, following ARP4754A guidelines significantly improves your chances of obtaining FAA, EASA, or Transport Canada certification.

2. How does ARP4754 relate to DO-178C and DO-254?

ARP4754 focuses on aircraft system development, while DO-178C addresses software certification and DO-254 covers hardware assurance. They are often used together for avionics development.

3. What are the key differences between ARP4754 and ARP4754A?

ARP4754 focuses on aircraft and system-level development processes, primarily for large, complex systems. ARP4754A refines this by introducing a more structured, safety-driven approach, aligning with DO-178C and DO-254 for software and hardware certification.

4. Who needs to follow ARP4754?

Aircraft manufacturers, system suppliers and engineering teams involved in the development and certification of aircraft systems should follow ARP4754 to ensure compliance with aviation safety standards.

5. How does ARP4754 relate to ARP4761?

ARP4754 focuses on system development and integration, while ARP4761 focuses on safety assessments. They are often used together to ensure a robust aircraft system design.

Inquire about ARP4754 services today!

"*" indicates required fields

CONTACT

ARP4754 Services: Expert Guidance for Aerospace Safety and Certification

What is ARP4754?

Why is ARP4754 Compliance Critical for Aerospace Systems?